RE: xmlsch-03 "lexical" mapping possible proposal plus discussion

> I like "datatype naming scheme" myself.  It certainly makes it clear 
> that URIrefs are (here) being used as names for datatypes.

Well, yes, but is this really a "naming scheme" specific to datatypes?
Seems like it's just the generic URI to resource denotation/mapping
and the only thing relating to datatyping is that the resources in
question happen to all be datatypes.

I wouldn't want to see a term that could easily be misunderstood to
indicate something other than that basic, generic URI to resource
mapping.

Patrick

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 01:49:20 UTC