- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:57:14 -0400 (EDT)
- To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com
From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> Subject: XML literals and Semantics doc Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:49:25 -0500 > http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_Editors.html > > is now dated 21a April. > > I have modified the terminology of XML literals (see intro to section > 3.1) to make the conditions both readable and right, and corrected a > mistake concerning the RDF namespace definition: thanks to Peter for > noticing these. > > Jeremy and/or Graham, I think this handles the grouse I had with you > about the needed XML literal terminology from Concepts. I still > think it would be better if your document defined this stuff, though. I agree entirely. > Peter, does this now read OK to you? If so I will formally respond to > your listed comments about XML literals. Well, on a quick read I can't find anything wrong. However, the whole development of XML literals is quite complicated and quite distasteful. (The latter is, of course, only my opinion.) Because of this I find that I have no confidence that it is correct, only that I can't find anything obviously wrong. > Otherwise this is unchanged in its essentials from the version of the 18th. > > The appendices are still to do. > > Pat peter
Received on Monday, 21 April 2003 22:58:43 UTC