- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:41:06 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Further to my message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0136.html I have re-submitted to the list a number of proposals for changes to RDF Concepts. I list below the *latest* message URIs. The changes compared with the earlier proposals are wording changes in response to comments received. Since the proposals are framed in terms of specific proposed text for changes to the Concepts document, it would help me if comments on the proposed text could be submitted to the list. If possible, I would like any teleconference discussion of the issues to be focused on: "It's OK" or "There's not yet consensus for this change -- bring it back later". The current issues, which I hope can considered at the next teleconference, are: pfps-22, pfps-23: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0201.html pfps-16: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0200.html williams-01: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0199.html RDF fragment text, and revision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0203.html .... Also for discussion: Additional change in response to pfps-14: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0204.html Revised response for timbl-02: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0196.html #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 09:42:13 UTC