Re: Messages lacking followup in rdf-comments

At 17:19 10/04/2003 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>At 12:42 08/04/2003 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>
>>At 15:04 04/04/2003 +0100, Jan Grant wrote:
>>
>>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0265.html
>>>[aaron's comment on 404s attached to pfps-14. No ack from Aaron]
>>
>>I propose that in the absence of response from Aaron, including no 
>>response to a follow-up prompting, we consider this point to be 
>>resolved/accepted -- i.e. no further action required.
>
>The current status is a little unclear in that your response indicates 
>that you will "add it to your notes".  Comments need to be accepted or 
>not.  I suggest you respond indicating either that you will make an 
>editorial correction or that you don't intend to, marking the comment as 
>closed.

Er, OK, done.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E

Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 07:15:35 UTC