- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:41:46 +0200
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: "jjc" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
See latest comment from Tex; we might be off the hook. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0020.html [[ 1) I now understand that the lowercasing of the lang identifier is constrained to the RDF graph. The proposed text is a better solution as it makes the specification explicit, but I would find the test cases as adequate to clarify the issue. ]] The "proposed text" was: [[ > Note: The case normalization of language tags is part of > the description of the abstract syntax, and implicitly the abstract > behaviour of RDF applications. It is not intended to constrain an > RDF implementation to actually normalize the case. Crucially, the result > of comparing two language tags should not be sensitive to the case of > the original input. ]] The "test cases" were: [[ > 1) add new test cases to reflect that > en-US en-us and en-Us > all mean the same thing. > This would be easy, and unlikely to meet opposition. ]] At the time, (a few weeks back), I had entailment tests in mind. I would prefer *not* to require lower case lang tags in N-triples, and Dave seems minded to oppose any graph comparison tests dressed up as parser tests. e.g. file1: <a> rdfs:comment "a"@en-us . file2: <a> rdfs:comment "a"@en-us . file3: <a> rdfs:comment "a"@en-US . Tests: file1 entails file2 file2 entails file3 file3 entails file1 So Yet another tex-01 proposal is: *** We resolve tex-01 by: - adding the note above to concepts - adding the test cases above to the test suite *** I am happy with any of the three proposals I have now made, this third is pretty much like the first: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0152.html but the note is shorter. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk] > I already asked the WG to stick with canonicalizing the lang tags > values to 1 form. I don't care what it is, as long as it is one way. > Anything else makes simple RDF applications harder. >
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 04:42:06 UTC