- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:31:44 +0300
- To: <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk] > Sent: 04 April, 2003 12:11 > To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere) > Cc: jjc; bwm; w3c-rdfcore-wg > Subject: Re: tex-01 new proposal > > > >>>"Patrick.Stickler" said: > > > > > > Just to check that I've understood this correctly: > > > > > tex01/test002.rdf > > > <rdf:RDF> > > > <rdf:Description xml:lang="en-US" eg:p="foo"/> > > > <rdf:Description xml:lang="en-us" eg:p="foo"/> > > > </rdf:RDF> > > > > results in > > > > > tex01/test002.nt > > > _:a eg:p "foo"@en-US . > > > > i.e., "en-us" -> "en-US" during parsing > > > > Right? > > no. So the resulting graph will then be _:a eg:p "foo"@en-US . _:b eg:p "foo"@en-us . ? Patrick > Those are not parser (rdf/xml -> rdf graph) tests - they are model > comparing tests. No parser will implement them and they must not be > added to the test cases as parser test cases. > > I already asked the WG to stick with canonicalizing the lang tags > values to 1 form. I don't care what it is, as long as it is one way. > Anything else makes simple RDF applications harder. > > Dave > >
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 04:38:33 UTC