- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:39:50 +0000
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
In the resolution of issues http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema the WG decided to allow <rdf:li> elements as typed nodes. This was at the time an arbritary decision, made primarily to ensure that there was a definite answer. There has been implementor feedback that this was not a good decision. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JulSep/0159.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0122.html The WG will also be considering by Friday issue: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use where it is proposed to disallow names from the RDF namespace in inappropriate contexts, e.g. rdf:Description not be allowed on a property element. I propose o Use of rdf:li is an error o http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf be deleted o that the test cases for rdfms-rdf-names-use should illustrate this error. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 13:40:20 UTC