- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:29:32 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
- CC: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, connolly@w3.org, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: > > At 10:14 PM 11/12/01 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > >It's one thing for RDF based *applications* to support and > >utilized XML Schema simple data types and their lexical and > >value spaces, but IMO RDF should itself be completely neutral > >to any particular data type scheme. > > I agree. > > My reading of what Peter/Dan have been saying is that XML schema datatypes > should be primus inter pares for data types in RDF, not somehow embedded in > the core of RDF. (Which I think is fine.) As long as a classical education isn't going to be required in order to read our specifications :-) -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 12:30:12 UTC