- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 12:24:24 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > [...] > > > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > > > > > > Frank, > > > > > > > > I thought the draft on the data model section was > > > > very well written, and I'm happy to see the clear > > > > discussion about URLs vs. URIs (though you go on > > > > to use HTTP URLs for abstract concepts anyway ;-) > > > > > > > > > Yeah, well I didn't want to introduce (and have to explain) a new URI > > > scheme. However, I can do that if you think it would make the > > > distinction clearer. > > > > Actually, no. I think the recent "clarification" doesn't > > clarify much, and in fact I prefer your present treatment. > > You owe uri@w3.org a comment to that effect, then. > > > I just thought you might toss in a few tag URIs or similar > > to show a little more heterogeny. > > Frank, don't use unregistered URI schemes. Rog. --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 12:24:56 UTC