Re: PRIMER: new draft data model section

Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> [...]
> > > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Frank,
> > > >
> > > > I thought the draft on the data model section was
> > > > very well written, and I'm happy to see the clear
> > > > discussion about URLs vs. URIs (though you go on
> > > > to use HTTP URLs for abstract concepts anyway ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, well I didn't want to introduce (and have to explain) a new URI
> > > scheme.  However, I can do that if you think it would make the
> > > distinction clearer.
> >
> > Actually, no. I think the recent "clarification" doesn't
> > clarify much, and in fact I prefer your present treatment.
> 
> You owe uri@w3.org a comment to that effect, then.
> 
> > I just thought you might toss in a few tag URIs or similar
> > to show a little more heterogeny.
> 
> Frank, don't use unregistered URI schemes.

Rog.

--Frank

-- 
Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 12:24:56 UTC