- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:36:05 -0600
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: [...] > [...] > > Regardless of the situation with respect to incompatibility with RDF, I > view incompatibility with XML I gather you mean XML Schema, not XML 1.0 itself... > as a fatal problem with both these proposals. > I think that a scheme that is not compatible with > > [possibly some some xml schema stuff that may or may not type the 7 below] > <foo [possibly some xml schema stuff that may or may not type the 7 below]> > <bar [possibly some some xml schema stuff that may or may not > type the 7 below]> > 7 > </bar> > </foo> > > is a non-starter. Er.. that's an awfully high bar. To date, it hasn't been necessary to implement XML Schema in order to parse RDF. I think that any scheme that requires an RDF parser to include an XML Schema processor to be a non-starter. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 10:36:50 UTC