- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:27:47 +0200
- To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > The X proposal is incompatible with all current usage as it > requires > > all literals to be replaced with URVs. Actually no. It doesn't require it, even if it does advise it. And apologies for not getting the summary out sooner. URV's are a useful component of the X proposal, but not the heart of it. Have a look at my posting today, and let me know what you think. Patrick
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 10:28:01 UTC