- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:23:31 +0100
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> With regards to >> P++. (Pat) > > If we go down the XML Schema datatypes route the use of the xsi:type > attribute to indicate type may well be appropriate... And give a syntax for > allowing the additional type arcs on Literal nodes, without going beyond our > current charter ! Jeremy, how would that be expressed in N-Triples? -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ P.S. Some other dumps... We think that "xyz" is *something* with literal representation 'xyz' So "10" could be the number 16 (hexadecimal), 10 (decimal), 8 (octal), 2 (binary), etc. If we have (in N3-without-contexts which is like N-Triples BTW!!!) ==== @prefix play: <http://example.org/play#>. @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>. @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>. play:me play:shoeSize "10". play:shoeSize rdfs:range xsd:decimal. ==== we can entail ==== @prefix play: <http://example.org/play#>. @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>. @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>. _:x is play:shoeSize of play:me; rdf:type xsd:decimal. ==== and also ==== @prefix play: <http://example.org/play#>. @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>. @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>. play:me play:shoeSize [ rdf:type xsd:decimal]. ==== I find the 'is ... of' way of expressing things quite convenient in that it allows to talk about literal values
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 11:25:15 UTC