- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:12:12 -0600
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Thanks for the info. > >This actually makes the example of the size property >even more meaningful, as it shows the ambiguity even >more clearly. Since there is no single derived type >"responsible" for disambiguation, there is no explicit >means to decide *which* range should be used to interpret >the non-locally typed literal. True, but this seems to be a general problem with any datatyping scheme, even the URV idea. If I use a URV with a 'unioned' type name, something has to be able to fit the right part of the datatype mapping with the particular lexical form it finds itself combined with. God help us if we allow a union of decimal and octal. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 19:12:01 UTC