- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 12:02:03 +0000
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Folks,
Just so folks are clear about what proposals S, P and X refer to:
The naming was first suggested by Jeremy in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0131.html
I added X.
Proposal P is the Hayes/Patel-Schneider proposal, loosely characterized as:
a "literal" node in a graph is labelled by a literal string, e.g. "10"
such a node may be the subject of an rdf:type property with value, e.g.
xsd:decimal to define its type. Such labelling may be implied by an
a range constraint in an rdf schema.
Proposal S was proposed by Sergey in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0530.html
It can be loosely characterized as:
typed values, such as the integer 10, are represented in the graph by a bNode.
The bNode will have one or more properties defining lexical representations
of the integer, e.g.
_:int <xsd:decimal> "10" .
Proposal X is the X-values idea from Patrick referred to in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0039.html
which be loosely characterized as
define a URI scheme for typed values e.g. dt:xsd:decimal:10.
Brian
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 07:06:55 UTC