- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 11:46:36 +0000
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- CC: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: > I vaguely remember that debate. I'm not sure that those of us involved > really had a clear idea what was meant - speaking for myself, I didn't. > Looking back in hindsight, I think we were crudely trying to distinguish > between a "statement" as a linguistic/syntactic entity (a "token"), and > a "stating" being its interpretation (or its denotation under some > interpretation?). It was other way round as I recall: statement is the abstraction, stating was the token/occurrence. Brian
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 06:52:03 UTC