Re: datatypes and MT

Pat Hayes wrote:

[...]


> 
> Maybe we should ask our Chair what the intended scope of this discussion 
> is supposed to be. By 'datatype' should we understand only XML 
> datatypes, or *any* datatyping scheme that anyone could possibly dream 
> up, or something in between? Are there any general assumptions that we 
> can make about all 'reasonable' datatyping schemes?


I would seek Dan Brickley's advice on this, however as a working assumption I 
would suggest we focus our attention on our charter requirement to explain to 
users how to use RDF Schema datatypes with RDF.

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 16:44:27 UTC