RE: incomplete datatyping (was: Re: datatypes and MT)

>  > > If we are going to use bnodes, I would rather write this as:
>>  >
>>  > _x rdf:type ComplexNumber
>>  > _x realPart _:y1
>>  > _x imaginaryPart _:y2
>>  > _:y1 xsd:number "1.0"
>>  > _:y2 xsd:number "2.0"
>>
>>  I'd prefer this representation too, not doubt.
>
>But aren't you confusing data type with property here?

Sorry, there are two different proposals on the table for using 
bNodes. DanC's version would be like yours below, Sergey's like the 
above. I was talking to Sergey in Sergeyish.

Pat

>Shouldn't it rather be:
>
>   _x rdf:type ComplexNumber
>   _x realPart _:y1
>   _x imaginaryPart _:y2
>   _:y1 rdf:value  "1.0"
>   _:y1 rdf:type xsd:number
>   _:y2 rdf:value "2.0"
>   _:y2 rdf:type xsd:number
>
>or better yet
>
>   _x rdf:type ComplexNumber
>   _x realPart _:y1
>   _x imaginaryPart _:y2
>   _:y1 rdf:value  "1.0"
>   _:y1 rdf:type xsd:float
>   _:y2 rdf:value "2.0"
>   _:y2 rdf:type xsd:float
>
>???
>
>Patrick


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 16:40:02 UTC