Re: datatypes and MT

>Pat Hayes wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>
>>Maybe we should ask our Chair what the intended scope of this 
>>discussion is supposed to be. By 'datatype' should we understand 
>>only XML datatypes, or *any* datatyping scheme that anyone could 
>>possibly dream up, or something in between? Are there any general 
>>assumptions that we can make about all 'reasonable' datatyping 
>>schemes?
>
>
>I would seek Dan Brickley's advice on this, however as a working 
>assumption I would suggest we focus our attention on our charter 
>requirement to explain to users how to use RDF Schema datatypes with 
>RDF.

??

  What exactly is the difference between an RDF Schema and an RDF 
Schema datatype, and how would one of the latter be used to fix the 
interpretation of a literal?

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 20:48:12 UTC