- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:21:13 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>>>Brian McBride said: > Dave Beckett wrote: > > > List of RDF attributes (henceforth The List) > > about aboutEach aboutEachPrefix > > ID bagID resource parseType > > li <_n> > > subject predicate object type value > > The idea, as I understood it, was to continue to accept, though deprecate, > the use of unprefixed attributes, where they appear unprefixed in the > current grammar. > > Thus I wasn't expecting subject, predicate, object, value, li and _m to > be in this list. Excellent, I'm happy to remove those from the list so I would like to amend item #1 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0087.html to be: 1. The current RDF/XML syntax uses the following attributes in the syntax (from my reference at http://www.redland.opensource.ac.uk/notes/concepts.html ) List of RDF attributes (henceforth The List) about aboutEach aboutEachPrefix ID bagID resource parseType The remaining concepts are not in the list because: Seq Bag Alt Property Statement - these are rdfs:Class-es and can never be used as attributes RDF Description - syntax only things that have no current use as attributes li _<n> subject predicate object type value - not allowed to be used unprefixed according to the grammar Aside: Actually rdf:subject rdf:predicate rdf:object rdf:value are not explicitly in the grammar BNF or discussion, but implicitly by being properties and thus matching 6.14 propName. rdf:value is only ever used in examples - Fig 14, 15, sec 7.4 examples - and is thus only implicitly defined as a property. rdf:subject, rdf:predicate and rdf:object are defined as properties in the formal model. Dave
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 06:21:13 UTC