Re: Model-specific identity for anon resources, and its representation: A new issue? from Aaron Swartz on 2001-06-15 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from June 2001)

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:32:15 -0500
To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Cc: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200106152335.f5FNZ3908572@theinfo.org>

On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 06:10  PM, Sergey Melnik wrote:

> I don't agree that anonymous nodes should be part of the abstract
> syntax, and would suggest to consider this issue when cleaning up the
> model.

I tend to agree with this position. However, I would take it one 
step further -- I believe that these "uniquely generated 
resources" should have consistent, repeatably generated URIs. 
That is, all parsers should assign the same genid to the same 
resource.

--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]

Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 19:32:29 UTC