Re: Model-specific identity for anon resources, and its representation: A new issue?

>On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 06:10  PM, Sergey Melnik wrote:
>
>>I don't agree that anonymous nodes should be part of the abstract
>>syntax, and would suggest to consider this issue when cleaning up the
>>model.
>
>I tend to agree with this position. However, I would take it one 
>step further -- I believe that these "uniquely generated resources" 
>should have consistent, repeatably generated URIs. That is, all 
>parsers should assign the same genid to the same resource.

Can you say why you want this?

Pat Hayes

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Monday, 25 June 2001 10:43:45 UTC