- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:55:23 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dan Brickley wrote: [...] > Having convinced myself there is indeed an issue here, I believe it > deserves a separate place in the issue list. > > Proposed issue summary: > > rdf-containers-formalmodel > [ > Parags 189-193 of M+S suggest a privileged role for RDF containers within > the formal model at the heart of RDF. Furthermore, they suggest > largely unimplemented (**need to hear about Jan's > implementation**) constraints, either on XML encodings of RDF, on other > (eg. database implementations) or on both. These paragraphs are either in > error (RDF does allow for partial descriptions) or editorially redundant: > in either case they should be removed. > ] Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-formalmodel added to the issues list. Brian
Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 06:56:56 UTC