- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:49:37 +0100
- To: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jan wrote: > In brief: > - does anyone out there actually _use_ the last clause of production > [6.12] in the grammar? > > namely: > > propertyElt ::= '<' propName idRefAttr? bagIdAttr? propAttr* '/>' > > The interpretation of this is given by paragraphs 229-243 > (see http://ioctl.org/rdf/ms/rdfms for numbers) or http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part > ...but an example is simpler. I've added some additional test cases. > > test1 shows this paragraph in action. Test2 demonstrates how an > anonymous resource is created even without an rdf:resource attribute. > Test3 shows something similar; this isn't currently allowed by the > grammar but is indistinguishable from test2. > > Finally, error1 shows that the value of the empty property in this case > (where propAttrs exist) is constrainted to be a resource; it's an error > to try doing otherwise. I've looked into those (that were attached to your mailmessage) and I couldn't find a problem in the reference results (but cwm 1.53 gives for all 5 cases a different different results) I guess that those testcases will be placed at http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/ -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 05:49:54 UTC