- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 20:33:02 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
r/reagle@w3.org/2002.06.11/14:10:30 >On Monday 10 June 2002 11:33 pm, merlin wrote: >> Attached is, probably not as clear as it could be, my >> alternative proposal in more explicit language, along with >> interop samples. > >Awesome Merlin! I've placed it at: > http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-filter2/Overview.html >(Contains a *few* editorial tweaks (e.g., adding an XPointer reference) but >otherwise made good sense on a quick read through.) > >I'm happy to update the interop matrix but I then need to remove the >present sets and reports; I'm sad to loose the sign-xfdl.xml example for >the performance profile, so a new version of that would be useful. sign-xfdl.xml is still in there; there are two signature documents; the XFDL one and the spec one; the spec one also includes a test of an empty input node set. merlin
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 15:33:37 UTC