- From: Tom Gindin <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 01:20:31 -0500
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: Merlin Hughes <merlin@baltimore.ie>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Actually, example.org is better for examples than the US Post Office
(usps.gov) .
Tom Gindin
Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>@w3.org on 04/02/2002 04:57:15 PM
Please respond to reagle@w3.org
Sent by: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org
To: Merlin Hughes <merlin@baltimore.ie>
cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Subject: Re: broken URL in the
Merlin, thank you for the new examples but I had a couple of questions.
I'm confused as to whether your update [1] is supposed to replace
merlin-fifteen and merlin-sixteen in the interop matrix? (I think for new
implementors, it's easier to download a working tar ball than one with some
broken versions and updates.)
Also, Don said he'd tried to restore xmldsig.pothole but I don't think he
has, and I'm still willing to provide a necessary URI.
As an aside, unless the post office has a address namespace, it's probably
best to start the URI with example.org.
Also, I wasn't sure what you were trying to do with [2], but I don't think
it worked since the attachement didn't get a new URI?
Finally, one of your examples uses
"http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#Reference" and that identifier does not
exist (there's no definition, if we need such an identifier we should
create one instead of abusing the 09/xmldsig namespace.)
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002JanMar/0263.html
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002JanMar/0263.html
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 01:21:13 UTC