- From: Thomas Maslen <maslen@dstc.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:39:16 +1000
- To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
We have been checking Beta 1 of our (DSTC) implementation against the interop matrix and merlin-xmldsig-{fifteen,sixteen}. My understanding was that some of these documents should *not* verify, because they have URIs that use id() functionality but the documents do not have DTDs that specify the relevant attributes with type ID. However, the interop matrix shows that everyone else has happily verified these signatures (and so have we, but only by implementing something that I think is a hack). So: - does my understanding need fixing? (an all too common event) - has everyone taken a pragmatic approach and implemented the moral equivalent of the example in the XPointer spec? http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr#schemes (i.e. the last thing in section 4.3, immediately above section 5; I'm not game to try writing a more accurate XPointer for it) - is there some other option that I should have realized? Thomas Maslen DSTC (By the way, merlin-xmldsig-sixteen was just wonderful for fingering bugs in my comment-filtering code -- blessings be upon Merlin H).
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2001 03:39:21 UTC