- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:07:32 -0400
- To: "John Boyer" <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- Cc: "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 14:31 5/16/2001 -0700, John Boyer wrote: ><merlin> >However, I see no alternative to simply deparenting embedded >signed documents before verification, if that does indeed work. ></merlin> > >Agreed. This is what everyone figured would have to happen. If we expect interopability over such ported signatures, should we amend the spec with any text to this end? __ Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2001 18:07:52 UTC