- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 12:27:55 +0200
- To: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, Petteri Stenius <Petteri.Stenius@remtec.fi>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG (E-mail)" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Excellent! At 19:05 2000-05-22 +0900, TAMURA Kent wrote: >Petteri and I tested interoperability between each >implementation. Petteri's implementation has succeeded in >verifying a signature produced by my implementation on last >Friday. > >We found some non-explicit points in the XML-Signaure spec. > - A trailing newline of canonicalized SignedInfo element > (Maruyama-san pointed out in this mailing list.) > - Endian for big integer values such as P, Q, G, Y, Modulus, > and Exponent > (It seems that the spec. mentions only 'I2OSP for (r, s)') Noted we'll try to disambiguate in the next draft. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 22 May 2000 06:28:45 UTC