Re: Interoperability testing

Barbara, could you suggest the approriate text?

At 12:32 2000-05-22 -0400, tgindin@us.ibm.com wrote:
 > >We found some non-explicit points in the XML-Signaure spec.
 > >  - A trailing newline of canonicalized SignedInfo element
 > >    (Maruyama-san pointed out in this mailing list.)
 > >  - Endian for big integer values such as P, Q, G, Y, Modulus,
 > >    and Exponent
 > >    (It seems that the spec. mentions only 'I2OSP for (r, s)')
 >
 >[Tom Gindin] We also need to mention something about the rules for leading
 >zeroes on big integers (assuming that big-endian is chosen).


_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.   
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 05:52:00 UTC