W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: RFC2518bis, was: BIND and live property value consistency

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:03:58 -0700
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.stpzoweheochem@lisa.local>

At this point it would be good to be clear about what we're doing.  I  
propose we try for Draft Standard and follow the rules that implies.  Do  
you think there's some reason we won't be able to do that?


On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:55:27 -0700, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  

> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> ...
>> Finally,
>>  - we go through the issues list until all issues are closed (where  
>> "closed" can also mean that the WG just states that it was unable to  
>> come up with a resolution)
>>  Best regards, Julian
> One additional thought:
> If -- while doing this -- we find that we can't resolve everything or if  
> we find features that we think need to be kept although no interop was  
> demonstrated, not going to "Draft" standard and republishing as  
> "Proposed" should be considered a viable option (compared to giving up).
> In practice, few people really understand the different standards  
> levels; and not updating the spec (with many known and resolved(!)  
> issues) at all certainly is worse then doing the update, but not  
> progressing on the standards ladder.
> Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 10 July 2005 23:04:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:34 UTC