- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 10:55:27 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > ... > Finally, > > - we go through the issues list until all issues are closed (where > "closed" can also mean that the WG just states that it was unable to > come up with a resolution) > > Best regards, Julian One additional thought: If -- while doing this -- we find that we can't resolve everything or if we find features that we think need to be kept although no interop was demonstrated, not going to "Draft" standard and republishing as "Proposed" should be considered a viable option (compared to giving up). In practice, few people really understand the different standards levels; and not updating the spec (with many known and resolved(!) issues) at all certainly is worse then doing the update, but not progressing on the standards ladder. Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 10 July 2005 08:55:34 UTC