- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:40:35 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > It depends on whether we're going for Draft Standard or not -- and it > was my understanding that Ted is keeping the WG open so we can bring > WebDAV to Draft Standard. To go to Draft Standard, we need to take a > Proposed Standard and remove the options that aren't implemented, > interoperable and tested 2x2. Yes. Every server that supports collections as WebDAV compliant resources already supports this feature. And every client that issues a PROPFIND without using other WebDAV methods already uses it. I'm not sure what kind of additional test you're looking for. > Another option that isn't broadly implemented, if at all, is the > support for locks that aren't write locks or aren't exclusive locks > (since only exclusive write locks are fully defined). Are there any > implementations at all that do locks that aren't write locks? Didn't > Adobe or somebody implement shared locks? Me confused. The only type of locks defined in RFC2518 are write locks. Write locks can be shared or exclusive, and there are both servers implementing this and clients using it. Looking at <http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm>, issue #96, the WG has discussed this over three years ago and concluced that they are indeed implemented. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 16:40:48 UTC