- From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:52:11 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Sep 13, 2004, at 5:16 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian Korver wrote:
>> Because these are conditions describing the state
>> of the world, not (in this context) mandates on
>> server behavior.
>
> Yes, they are.
>
> It says exactly when the server behaviour gets extended (when the type
> isn't "simple string" *and* if the property isn't defined in RFC2518).
>
> Can you suggest alternative wording that keeps the RFC2119
> terminology?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Julian,
I'm officially confused. Your text states that they
are conditions ("the following conditions"), but you
claim here that they're not. Anyhow, not worth arguing
about....
-brian
briank@xythos.com
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 17:52:47 UTC