- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:16:19 +0200
- To: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Brian Korver wrote: > > Because these are conditions describing the state > of the world, not (in this context) mandates on > server behavior. Yes, they are. It says exactly when the server behaviour gets extended (when the type isn't "simple string" *and* if the property isn't defined in RFC2518). Can you suggest alternative wording that keeps the RFC2119 terminology? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 00:16:58 UTC