Re: Request for feedback: WebDAV property datatype draft

Because these are conditions describing the state
of the world, not (in this context) mandates on
server behavior.

-brian
briank@xythos.com

On Sep 13, 2004, at 3:06 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian Korver wrote:
>
>> Julian,
>> I think that the MUST and MUST NOT in the following should really
>> be must and must not, in other words:
>>  5.1  Marshalling of datatype information
>>    PROPFIND is extended to return the data type information for
>>    properties unless one of the following conditions is met:
>>    o  The data type must be different from "xs:string" (because this 
>> can
>>       be considered the default data type).
>>    o  The property's data type must not be defined in [RFC2518] 
>> (because
>>       these types are already well-defined).
>> -brian
>> briank@xythos.com
>
> OK, I got that backwards.
>
> Why do you think they should be lowercase? Are you anticipating 
> servers that either do not want or can't implement it exactly that 
> way? If so, why?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>

Received on Monday, 13 September 2004 23:56:44 UTC