W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Minor issue in RFC2518bis05, DAV:href

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:48:48 +0100
Message-ID: <400D6A00.1010806@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> Do you think that the ability to contain 'opaquelocktoken' URIs is 
> the sole exception, or is it generally OK for href to contain non-HTTP
> URLs?  I believe the latter would cause some problems among clients.

Not generally. But there are other exceptions such as URIs that can 
appear in 

> And, is it always ok to have opaquelocktoken URIs in hrefs, or only
> in certain circumstances?

Only in certain cirumstances. So any element that re-uses DAV:href needs 
to state that if it isn't prepared to accept any URI (productions 
absoluteURI and relativeURI in RFC2396).

Regards, Julian

<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2004 12:57:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:30 UTC