Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties

Let me phrase this differently... :-)

Does anyone besides Julian... :-)

...feel there is a change in the 2518 spec needed in regard to the
following posting by Julian...   :-)

Please speak up.


> currently RFC2518 is silent on this issue.
>
> However, deltaV says 1.5 [1]: "Although WebDAV request and
> response bodies
> can be extended by arbitrary XML elements, which can be ignored by the
> message recipient, an XML element in the DAV namespace MUST NOT
> be used in
> the request or response body of a versioning method unless that
> XML element
> is explicitly defined in an IETF RFC."
>
> I think something similar needs to be added to the revision to RFC2518.

----------------------------------------------------------------------



To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Message-ID: <OF5FC2C470.C50DFF6B-ON85256B66.00704BB6@pok.ibm.com>
From: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:29:33 -0500
Subject: Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties

Do we feel there is a change in the 2518 spec needed in regard to the
following posting by Julian...


> currently RFC2518 is silent on this issue.
>
> However, deltaV says 1.5 [1]: "Although WebDAV request and response
bodies
> can be extended by arbitrary XML elements, which can be ignored by the
> message recipient, an XML element in the DAV namespace MUST NOT be used
in
> the request or response body of a versioning method unless that XML
element
> is explicitly defined in an IETF RFC."
>
> I think something similar needs to be added to the revision to RFC2518.


------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com

Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 14:01:05 UTC