- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:45:20 -0800
- To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
I strongly feel that a revision of RFC 2518 should state that the "dav:" property namespace is reserved for use by IETF-approved Standards-Track specifications, and that client implementations MUST NOT use this namespace for application-specific properties. Pragmatically, I think existing exceptions to this rule should be grandfathered. - Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:44 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org > Subject: Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties > > > Let me phrase this differently... :-) > > Does anyone besides Julian... :-) > > ...feel there is a change in the 2518 spec needed in regard to the > following posting by Julian... :-) > > Please speak up. > > > > currently RFC2518 is silent on this issue. > > > > However, deltaV says 1.5 [1]: "Although WebDAV request and > > response bodies > > can be extended by arbitrary XML elements, which can be ignored by the > > message recipient, an XML element in the DAV namespace MUST NOT > > be used in > > the request or response body of a versioning method unless that > > XML element > > is explicitly defined in an IETF RFC." > > > > I think something similar needs to be added to the revision to RFC2518. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org > Message-ID: <OF5FC2C470.C50DFF6B-ON85256B66.00704BB6@pok.ibm.com> > From: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:29:33 -0500 > Subject: Re: Using DAV namespace for proprietary properties > > Do we feel there is a change in the 2518 spec needed in regard to the > following posting by Julian... > > > > currently RFC2518 is silent on this issue. > > > > However, deltaV says 1.5 [1]: "Although WebDAV request and response > bodies > > can be extended by arbitrary XML elements, which can be ignored by the > > message recipient, an XML element in the DAV namespace MUST NOT be used > in > > the request or response body of a versioning method unless that XML > element > > is explicitly defined in an IETF RFC." > > > > I think something similar needs to be added to the revision to RFC2518. > > > ------------------------------------------ > Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com >
Received on Friday, 22 February 2002 19:46:56 UTC