- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 17:49:15 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 16 January 2000 20:50:09 UTC
The last sentence of the last paragraph of section 4 reads "Implementations MUST ensure the integrity of bindings." Similar language is used in the second paragraph of section 5.1. However the term "integrity" was never well defined inside of the specification. As such it is impossible to comply with this requirement in an interoperable way. I would strongly caution against attempting to specify the definition for integrity, English is much too inexact a language for such an attempt to be successful. As such, I move that both sentences be removed and be replaced with a series of statements that define, in exact language, the requirements that are to be represented by the term "integrity", each sentence properly qualified with a MUST.
Received on Sunday, 16 January 2000 20:50:09 UTC