W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: BIND Error Codes

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <gclemm@tantalum.atria.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:44:58 -0400
Message-Id: <9909161244.AA03951@tantalum>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I also prefer the explanatory XML body approach.


   From: "Yaron Goland (Exchange)" <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>

   Adding yet another error code for this is probably a waste. I think 501 is
   the right code but you should add an XML body with an element indicating
   what went wrong. You could use a header but the error status is something
   (as you are now finding) that people will want to be able to expand in the
   future. XML is expandable, headers are not.


   > From: Slein, Judith A [mailto:JSlein@crt.xerox.com]
   > Currently the binding spec says that if the server can't guarantee the
   > required binding behavior, it must fail the BIND request with 
   > a 501 (Not
   > Implemented).  Period.  No further explanation.  We could 
   > just leave it at
   > that, but we think it would be useful to the client to know 
   > that the reason
   > the BIND can't be done is that the server can't guarantee integrity of
   > bindings to resources on another server (for example).
   > We could use a different (new) error code for "Can't create 
   > cross-server
   > binding."
   > We could stick with 501, but provide further explanation in 
   > the response
   > body.
   > We could leave the spec as it is.
   > Any preferences?
   > --Judy
   > Judith A. Slein
   > Xerox Corporation
   > jslein@crt.xerox.com
   > (716)422-5169
   > 800 Phillips Road 105/50C
   > Webster, NY 14580
Received on Thursday, 16 September 1999 08:45:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:18 UTC