- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:21:26 -0700
- To: "Yaron Goland (Exchange)" <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Yaron Goland (Exchange) wrote: >... > There is an alternative route which I believe meets everyone's needs. We > define a new header, which can optionally be used with mandatory, that > specifies that the move is only to succeed if the lock (if any) is moved > with it. If the header is absent the server MUST NOT move the lock. The > benefit of this system is that existing clients will continue to properly > interoperate with both existing WebDAV servers and future WebDAV servers. In > addition existing WebDAV servers will be able to properly interoperate with > both existing WebDAV clients and future WebDAV clients. Why a new header? MOVE has a defined body. Add a new XML element in there. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Wednesday, 15 September 1999 20:32:03 UTC