- From: <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 12:26:20 -0400
- To: "Slein, Judith A" <JSlein@crt.xerox.com>
- cc: "'John Stracke'" <francis@ecal.com>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> Thanks. Good catch. We'll fix this definition. I'm not sure he was suggesting a change. Just making an interesting and humorous comment. I'm more comfortable leaving "zero" in there and let folks ponder the epistemological point. "Resources" can have zero bindings... so they can have zero mappings. Remember our definition of resource is intentionally fuzzy/flexible as Roy often points out... and the versioning stuff does add another way for a resource to have "zero" bindings in the context of a workspace depending on your perspective. Of course if you speak of a "bound resource", then zero doesn't apply.
Received on Monday, 24 May 1999 12:26:24 UTC