On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) <jungshik@google.com> wrote: > ICU's IDNA 2003 implementation just does that. Before Chrome switched to UTS > 46 a few milestones ago, that's what's used by Chrome. > > And, Safari is likely to still use that (well, it depends on Mac OS X's > network API so that its behavior may differ on different OS X/iOS's). Earlier in this thread I provided a test case that shows Safari handles code points added after Unicode 3.2 just fine. Pretty sure the same was true for Chrome when I tested it. Hard to verify now. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 23:08:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:57 UTC