W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > December 2013

Re: reviving the file URI scheme

From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 21:12:05 +1000
Message-ID: <CACweHNBz8=ZTyt1wiH9soNxiZtKy7SDK28Ax5FMx2mtZbptO1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, uri@w3.org
On 13 December 2013 20:35, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> My point was that the WHATWGs url spec already standardizes file://, so
> Im trying to understand if there is need for the RCF also? or if the two
> can be somehow merged so we dont end up with duplicate specs.

The WhatWG's URL living standard has rules for parsing a 'file' URI, but
it doesn't have rules for generating one (you could infer them from the
parsing rules, with a bit of creative license) nor does it specify any
semantics for what to do with that URI once you've parsed it (e.g. mapping
it to the filesystem).

It really does read more like a pseudocode reference implementation of the
interesting bits of RFCs 3986, 1738, etc. than a spec, per se.

  Matthew Kerwin
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 11:12:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:16 UTC