- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:33:52 +1000
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, uri@w3.org
On Friday, December 13, 2013 at 12:43 AM, John Cowan wrote: > It's in his bibliography. But like most (all?) WHATWG products, it is a > reference implementation, not a standard. I think you might be confused: a browser is a reference implementation (in that you can reference it as attempting to implement a standard); a standard is a technical specification that has multiple implementations and is overseen by a standardization authority (in this case, the WHATWG). -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 02:34:23 UTC