- From: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:04:25 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, URI <uri@w3.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
On Oct 24, 2012, at 1:47 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Jan Algermissen wrote: >> >> What matters is that nothing of the existing URI spec *changes*. >> >> Can you agree on that? > > Do you mean the actual text, or the normative meaning of the text? I ideally mean the actual text, but it might be that there is some overlap in the construction algorithms - I am not expert enough there to judge that. The point really was to make it very clear that *additional* stuff is going to be said and that existing implementations that follow the URI spec strictly remain conforming. Jan > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 11:04:53 UTC