- From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:46:32 -0400
- To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
- cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
--On Friday, July 08, 2011 19:37 +0200 Frank Ellermann
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 July 2011 16:54, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>
>>> draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-04.txt
>...
> The anonymous:mail construct is also not more state of the art
> for privacy reasons, unless it is a mail address in TLD invalid
> or similar.
Disagree. If I'm an FTP repository provider, I can ask you to
give up your email address in return for service if I want to.
Whether I trust the address you give me is another matter, but
that isn't a privacy issue.
>...
I've already expressed my concerns about a number of other
components of this scheme.
john
Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 18:28:21 UTC