W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2011

Re: The state of 'afs' URi scheme

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:20:20 -0800
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-Id: <3792F8F3-D01B-4B05-9E73-59228F09FE5C@gbiv.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
On Jan 30, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I'd like to resume the discussion on 'afs' URI scheme by citing RFC 4395:
>  
>> In some circumstances, it is appropriate to note a URI scheme that
>>    was once in use or registered but for whatever reason is no longer in
>>    common use or the use is not recommended.  In this case, it is
>>    possible for an individual to request that the URI scheme be
>>    registered (newly, or as an update to an existing registration) as
>>    'historical'.  Any scheme that is no longer in common use MAY be
>>    designated as historical; the registration should contain some
>>    indication to where the scheme was previously defined or documented.
> 
> So there is a sense in moving this scheme to Historical category since it fully matches to these guidelines.  Therefore I do not consider such action as inappropriate for the 'afs' URI scheme.

No, there is no reason to publish a new document about a
scheme that was never used.  It is obsolete.

....Roy
Received on Sunday, 30 January 2011 18:20:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:14 UTC