- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:20:20 -0800
- To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
- Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
On Jan 30, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to resume the discussion on 'afs' URI scheme by citing RFC 4395: > >> In some circumstances, it is appropriate to note a URI scheme that >> was once in use or registered but for whatever reason is no longer in >> common use or the use is not recommended. In this case, it is >> possible for an individual to request that the URI scheme be >> registered (newly, or as an update to an existing registration) as >> 'historical'. Any scheme that is no longer in common use MAY be >> designated as historical; the registration should contain some >> indication to where the scheme was previously defined or documented. > > So there is a sense in moving this scheme to Historical category since it fully matches to these guidelines. Therefore I do not consider such action as inappropriate for the 'afs' URI scheme. No, there is no reason to publish a new document about a scheme that was never used. It is obsolete. ....Roy
Received on Sunday, 30 January 2011 18:20:46 UTC