Re: Status of RFC 1738 -- 'ftp' URI scheme

Charles Lindsey scripsit:

> Put more simply, if you write file://host/blah-blah-blah, then if you  
> write a POSIX open call open("blah-blah-blah", ...) then it ought to 
> work, and you define the format of blah-blah-blah so that it is so. All 
> you ahve to worry about then is where percent-coding is needed, and 
> perhaps whether some relative URI is possible.

So far so good.  The messy part is what the authority means when it is
neither empty nor "localhost", and clients differ widely in this respect.

And it was said that ever after, if any                 John Cowan
man looked in that Stone, unless he had a     
great strength of will to turn it to other    
purpose, he saw only two aged hands withering
in flame.   --"The Pyre of Denethor"

Received on Monday, 3 January 2011 14:38:56 UTC