- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:32:22 +0100
- To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
- CC: David Recordon <davidrecordon@facebook.com>, "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>
On 17.02.2010 19:21, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 9:13 AM > >> What exactly is broken with the system? > > Getting consensus on a new URI scheme is hard. The registry also doesn't reflect reality (more unregistered schemes than registered). For example, I don't know what is going on with the about: scheme but it seems to take a long time for something that seems simple. 1) Yes it is. (I consider that a feature). 2) That's a problem it shares with all registries I'm aware of. 3) I'm following that ID; believe me, that was entirely caused by lack of bandwidth by the authors - maybe that is fixed now. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 18:33:17 UTC